WE HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR OUR LIVES FOR 1,500 YEARS.
Whites have been “genocided” far more often that they’ve done it to others.
Also, it’s important to note, that Whites are, by far, the most generous, magnanimous people.
^ that’s a load of horseshit. Mongol and Turkic rule does not compare to the genocide seen in the New World. I’d argue things would have went better for the world had the Turks taken everything, their brand of slavery was not even comparable to the Portuguese model.
And you focus on one single facet of the entire argument, and you compared arguably the MOST EXTREME brand of slavery in human existence against all others in a period of thousands of years as to represent the methods of an entire continent. For that matter, the Muslim nations did practice horrendous slavery at the colonial era as well, Darfur being the most obvious and well-sourced example.
The guy above writes clumsily, uses rough terms that you often find in the crude works of people that have no business in academia because they want to push a socio-political isue, but the observations are essentially correct. Cultural Marxism can definitely be argued to be used as a method to undermine great colonial powers and their powerbase (the capitalists/monarchy) in order to liberate the working classes of the entire world by bringing them to the same level. No longer could the European powers claim racial supremacy, and that’s one of the things we can thank the Marxism movements of the 19th century of establishing in the Western mentality that Christianity had not succeeded and the ideals of the Enlightenment hadn’t been able to do either; Imposing a sense of equal worth amongst all peoples in recent times.
But enough about Cultural Marxism. No matter what you do, or what opinions you do, you will cause a ruckus whenever you mention that term because it is so laden with politically charged motives.
Darfur did not see death rates as in the New World, 90% being the lower figure (Valley of Mexico). I don’t recall the industrial model (work to death in 5-7 years) of slave labor being used anywhere besides the New World.
Nah, the thesis of his argument is that whites have been somehow “fighting for their lives” against brown people. Which is a crock of horseshit. My point is that the Mongols and Turks, while engaged in military campaigns against western powers, were not interested in “wiping out” whites. The campaigns were military ones of conquest, no different than England invading France, etc. He chalks it up as a battle for survival.
I left parts of his argument that were particularly ridiculous. White “genocide” (he uses anglo-saxons in England as an example, but to call that genocide is awkward since there was much integration) cannot outnumber the millions lost in the New World and Africa (9 million dead in the Valley of Mexico, 3.5 in the Carribean, estimated 20 million dead from the transport from Africa).
To call them “the most magnanimous” is ridiculous, considering all the shit that went on in the New World and after. He also used an argument against lumping whites into all the whites in the world, yet does exactly that.
That entire argument he gave was too silly to even dispute. Literally throwing up random and irrelevant “facts” followed by stupid and self-righteous opinions.
Not even logical enough to be taken seriously. Especially that weak ass circular argument about whites being lumped together LMFAO. Like we all put up the WHITES ONLY signs ourselves lmfaoo. It’s too much.
Slackliner Manuel Kreissig in action …
I met Manuel in Verdon a few weeks back. Pretty much by accident while breaking some slacklining rules ;-). Despite this awkward moment it was very kind of him to let me catch this little sequence. Pretty impressive stuff Manuel … Thanks!
i don’t get together on thanksgiving to give thanks for the colonization of this land, the enslavement of my peoples or the genocide of many indigenous peoples. i give thanks and get together with my family for surviving another year in a nation founded on all of that.